Asimov's predictions about the 21st Century were not far off. He believed there were two places the world could be at; one where people chose the "sane" path and prosper perhaps indefinitely or chose not to change and twirl into a downward spiral of virtually nothing.
Asimov spends most of the lecture on his prediction of the "sane" path. He believes the world will reach equality not only sexually but racially as well. In the future women will need to have less children, therefore they will have to find other things to do. The solution; give them jobs. This is very accurate because now in 2011 there are women running the government, science, and industry just as Asimov predicted. Stay at home mothers are much rarer now then they were in the 70's when Asimov gave this speech. Women have charged forward and now have the same oppourtunities as men in the business world. Racial equality on the other hand, is still in the works of the 21st Century. Many programs have been put into place to ensure equality happens. Although idealistically these laws and programs should have eradicated racism, it still exists in today's society. However, it is something sought after by many and it the next ninety years, it is sure to be a reality. Asimov is not off track when he predicts a world without racism.
Although most predictions were reasonable, Asimov's thoughts of being in a world without war seem very unrealistic. He was correct when he talked about nuclear war, the world can easily be destroyed in a half hour's time. However, regular wars where "you send bombs in envelopes, or stick some sticks of dynamite in an automobile in a buys place" happen regularly. The U.S. is still involved in affairs with Iraq and Afganistan. Wars like this will continue on for many years to come. I fail to see the world without war in the 21st Century, however it is a goal that all countries should strive for.
Asimov's sense of humor draws the audience in and allows them to enjoy his lecture. Constant laughter came from the crowd and myself. I enjoyed his jokes when he spoke about new oppourtunities for women opening up in the 21st Century. Although they were meant to be humorous, they were quite honest but kept the lecture light and entertaining. My favorite anecdote he used was him recalling the story "The Man Who Awoke." He talked of the way people reacted to those geeky kids who were into science fiction. He made fun of himself as being one of the "snot-nosed kids too smart for their own good." But at the same time pointed out how at the ripe age of thirteen he realized the earth's natural resources were due to run out at some point. His sarcasm against himself prevents him from sounding like a pompous genius who has created a lecture to share his insights about the future with others. From his sarcasm about figuring things out as a young teenager, we can learn that simple ideas are not always easily discovered. Like coal and oil are finite substances.
Issac Asimov has clearly used synoptic philosophy to come to his conclusions about the future. When talking about the Earth's changing weather, he looked at all places of the world and how they would be affected from the dust. He used syllogisms and critical thinking throughout this process. He even considers the past with the horrible dustbowl and other bad weather spells. Asimov looks at things from every angle and every possible possibility before reaching his conclusion on the matter.
This was a very interesting response. I agree that his idea of a world without war is unreasonable (conflict will always be present in a social setting), but I believe that the examples of Iraq and Afghanistan, for Asimov, do not truly constitute wars. According to Asimov, those conflicts have no meaning; "It's not really a war, you're just amusing yourself!" These small conflicts have no chance of ever ending. The nature of humanity will not allow it. However, under Asimov's definition of war, it seems to me that the world is mostly free of it.
ReplyDeleteI feel that you are sadly correct when you say that it would be hard to have a world without war. Even though most people including me want to believe that a world without war is possible i to know that it isn't. people are always going to have differences and people are going to want to fight for those differences because people are going to feel that they are right and the other person is wrong. with this technology it makes war easier, sending a nuclear bomb out that can kill millions with just a touch of a button is a war's dream. it would be hard to not have any war but it should be something that as a people we should work for.
ReplyDeleteI agree with how you said that women now have progresses since the 1970's and have jobs and run for president, but I think this prediction was only half correct. There are many contries around the world where women do not have these same rights. His prediction is true to an extent but there definitely needs to be much more change for it to be true around the whole world.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure if a world without racism is a surefire reality we'll see in the next ninety years. There are definitely still going to be people in this world who maintain viwes on one race being superior in the other, since it plays so much into our nature as humans; for some, it's extremely difficult or impossible to change. But the possibility of change is one that will surely keep happening.
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree with you when you stated that Asimov is not off track when saying that there will soon and hopefully be a world without racism. Not as rampant as it was in our past, racism still exists and this surely needs to be fixed. However this is not easily done, especially seeing as there are over 6 billion people populating this earth, all with different opinions and views.
ReplyDeleteThe sane path is boring though right? But later Asimov comes up with ways to take risks with other planets...yea. Anyways, I agree with you that a world without war is nearly impossible, though we have found other ways to stop something right? Every positive has something negative and vice versa. Either we'll do that or end up having 100 people going to the moon while the earth gets wasted with our nuclear power. And women do play a larger role now. Not only in the government but they have great influence over people: take Angelina Jolie helping kids out in Afghanistan, and actresses promoting green energy etc etc... :)
ReplyDeleteI found it interesting as well how Asimov categorized the two, so to speak, 'fates' of the world: the sane path and the insane path. If we take the sane path, we can prosper and thrive into something magnificent. Conversely, if we take the insane path, we will have chosen to not make any reforms and quickly spiral into a failed world of pure misery and inequality. I do think that Asimov had a fair amount of faith in us to choose the sane path - but he did also warn us of the dangers of taking the insane path.
ReplyDelete